What’s A Pound Worth? The Conversation Continues…

Since 2001, the Union Internationale des Avocats World Forum of Mediation Centres (UIAWFMC) has brought together the best commercial dispute resolution professionals and representatives from ADR centres around the world. Its purpose is to foster the exchange of views on the development of ADR (with a focus on mediation), enhance knowledge, consider emerging best practices and learn from other cultures. The Forum takes place every 9 months in a different international venue.

Left to Right: Former GPC Series 2016-17 Executive Committee members: Loong Seng Onn – Executive Director SMC; Emma-May Litchfield and Danielle Hutchinson – authors of the Singapore Report; Professor Nadja Alexander – Academic Director SIDRA.

The 24th Annual UIAFMC was held in Singapore in collaboration with SIDRA, SMU, SIMI and SMC. Like the GPC Series 2016-17, the forum attracted international delegates – many of whom have participated in multiple events. As the authors of the Singapore Report, we were invited to join a global panel to share our analysis and insights from the GPC. Other panellists were Ross W. Stoddard III (Attorney-Mediator from the USA) and Assistant Professor Dorcas Quek from the SMU School of Law (former District Court Judge in Singapore).

We then encouraged the participants to consider the relevance of the GPC findings to their own practices. They agreed that to provide the most effective client support, practitioners must themselves become dispute-savvy and not simply endorse familiar dispute resolution processes.

Left to right: Ross W. Stoddard III, Assistant Professor Dorcas Quek, Emma-May Litchfield and Danielle Hutchinson

Our session re-introduced the concept of the dispute-savvy client which we identified from the data we analysed for the Singapore Report. The delegates recognised the continuing value of this concept and engaged in energetic discussion about how their local jurisdictions accommodate the different wants, needs and expectations of disputing parties.

This re-inforced the observations in our previous blog, that practitioners need to help clients to identify the particular features of their dispute, and support them in selecting the DR process best suited to their desired outcomes.

Participants were influenced by the example of the early adopters of the GPC findings (such as Herbert Smith Freehills in London and the Victorian Department of Justice and Regulation in Australia). These early adopters are demonstrating an appetite to build practices showcasing a client-centric perspective.

As we see it, the Global Pound Conversation continues to challenge practitioners to step up and join the next iteration of DR where best practice will demand evidence-based, client-centred, flexible and collaborative DR practices.

Written by Emma-May Litchfield and Danielle Hutchinson.

emdanielle-hutchinson

Emma-May Litchfield and Danielle Hutchinson are academics in Australia, who focus on empirically-based applied research. They work in both the Melbourne Graduate School of Education at the University of Melbourne and the Graduate School of Business and Law at RMIT University. At present, Danielle and Emma-May sit on the Executive and Academic Committees of the Global Pound Conference Series 2016-17.

Danielle and Emma-May are the co-founders and directors of the consulting firm Resolution Resources, who provide dispute resolution services and solutions both nationally and internationally. Together they work as dispute resolution advisors, providers and educators.

Leave a Reply